Log in to check your private messages
LGBT - The Most Dangerous Debate
Page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Dark Sith Lords Forum Index » Coruscant Debates View previous topic :: View next topic  
 Posted:  
Message
  Please Register and Login to this forum to stop seeing this advertsing.







LGBT - The Most Dangerous Debate
 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:46 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  High Mage Serratus
Sith Marauder
Sith Marauder

Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 1578


Location: Eating a bagel (LIKE A BOSS)

On another forum, this debate became quite heated as the fundamentalist theists, forum homosexuals, approving liberals and furiously no-no conservatives and mix-and-matches of all of the above battled it out citing nature, the Bible, the Netherlands and even Ron Paul in their quest to prove their points. At last count there were 11, 255 replies. And thus I begin:

1. What is your opinion of homosexuality and bisexuality and of homosexuals and bisexuals?

2. What is your opinion on gay marriage?

3. What is your opinion on gay adoption?
_________________



If you see dreadlocks and a staff coming towards you very rapidly, you're in trouble.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:36 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  High Prophet Crozeus
Sith Priest
Sith Priest

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 4498


Location: I am yu, and he is mi.

I agree, this debate is dangerous ground, and I must say that if anyone here does possess extreme views, please keep them to yourself. I remind some newer members that there are a large number of homosexual members here, including our fair Emperor. Any intolerence will be punsihed. On that cheery note, here are my views.

1. All in all, it comes down to the person. they can choose whatever they want. I don't care if they are homosexual, bisexual, transexual, metrosexual, hetrosexual, omnisexual, or anything, if they want to be something then that is up to them, not us to judge.

2. Non hetrosexual mariage is just the same as any other marriage. The only circumstance in which it would be different is if they were strictly religious, and, (generalising here) most religions dis-approve of homosexualality anyway. Again, it comes down to choice, if they want to get married then so be it. If prejudiced ministers don't wed them, I think Civil Partnerships should also be marriage licenses.

3. Now, here, my views conflict a bit. The well-being of the child is incredibly important, and in the world, chances are the kid is going to be bullied a bit, you know, "two dads/mums" kinda thing. But still it is their choice and I'm sure the kid would be happier with a family rather than in a home.
_________________




View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:48 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  High Mage Serratus
Sith Marauder
Sith Marauder

Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 1578


Location: Eating a bagel (LIKE A BOSS)

Ah ah, now Crozeus, extreme views are the most fun to derail.

Personally:

1. I have numerous gay and bi friends and I think they're all great, I have a lack of respect for those who disagree with what my friends are by nature.

2. Marriage is marriage. If a cow got married to a pansexual, I wouldn't give a damn. Gay marriage is just as pure as any marriage.

3. I believe wholeheartedly in gay adoption, it is immoral in my view to prevent anyone from having a child unless they are unfit to be parents. Admittedly Crozeus, I agree with your sentiments on bullying but I also know that will always be an argument used not for the sake of the children but by homophobes to oppress the LGBT community.
_________________



If you see dreadlocks and a staff coming towards you very rapidly, you're in trouble.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:51 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  High Prophet Crozeus
Sith Priest
Sith Priest

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 4498


Location: I am yu, and he is mi.

I mean if they were to be discriminating or derogatory.
_________________




View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:47 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  High Mage Serratus
Sith Marauder
Sith Marauder

Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 1578


Location: Eating a bagel (LIKE A BOSS)

Yes, I know, they're the ones that are the most fun to defeat with logic and watch their spouters roll around in despair and denial.
_________________



If you see dreadlocks and a staff coming towards you very rapidly, you're in trouble.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:03 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  High Prophet Crozeus
Sith Priest
Sith Priest

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 4498


Location: I am yu, and he is mi.

Or incomprehension.
_________________




View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:14 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  High Mage Serratus
Sith Marauder
Sith Marauder

Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 1578


Location: Eating a bagel (LIKE A BOSS)

Yes, or that. Actually, more likely that than the other two.
_________________



If you see dreadlocks and a staff coming towards you very rapidly, you're in trouble.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:59 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Darth Cruiciatus
Sith Master
Sith Master

Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 1337


Location: With the sheep lovers- the Welsh

Ooh, Boy, this might be a hot debate(as in flame war) Very Happy

1. I see nothing wrong with Homosexuality and Bisexuality, or any other sexuality(unless it involves stuff with animals, Laughing)

2. Seriously, there is no good reason for banning gay marriage. If your reason is "Marriage is a sacred ceremony between a man and a woman", honestly, an hero now. If allowing gays to marry screws up the "sacred" ceremony, then what do you say about divorces that actually "break" up the marriage and happen frequently(I've heard 50% of all marriages, though I could be wrong.) I don't want to offend any Christians, but if you think that because the bible says it is wrong, that it is, the bible also says that earth is 6000 years old. O RLY?

3. Once again, there is nothing wrong with it. I don't want to be stereotyping gays, but from what I've seen, they are very caring, and wouldn't you want a child to be in a caring household raised by gay people, or in an abusive household? Not that all heterosexual people are abusive, it's just nearly all of the child abuse stuff is from heterosexual couples.


Oh, and I like using bold, underline, and large text to accentuate my points. I feel it really makes them stand out. Laughing Laughing Laughing
_________________


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:59 am Reply with quote  
Message
  High Prophet Crozeus
Sith Priest
Sith Priest

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 4498


Location: I am yu, and he is mi.

Yes, we can see that. In the UK, laws for homosexual displays in public can result in 2 years in prison. Bestiality (sex with animals) is also 2 years in prison. (Although only recently.)
_________________




View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:44 am Reply with quote  
Message
  High Mage Serratus
Sith Marauder
Sith Marauder

Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 1578


Location: Eating a bagel (LIKE A BOSS)

Really Crozeus? That is horrific. Here we have all the rights for gays except marriage and adoption.
_________________



If you see dreadlocks and a staff coming towards you very rapidly, you're in trouble.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:05 am Reply with quote  
Message
  High Prophet Crozeus
Sith Priest
Sith Priest

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 4498


Location: I am yu, and he is mi.

It needs to be updated, but our government are incompetent t***s. Civil partnerships are allowed and so is adoption so it's really dumb.
_________________




View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:11 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Grand Inquisitor Prognie
Dark Lord of the Sith
Dark Lord of the Sith

Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 1598



1) My opinion is obviously biased but I do believe being gay/bi is fine and is natural as being straight, tall, or small.

2) My opinion of marriage is that if it's a legal marriage then it's fine, I don't think we are in our power to force religions to acknowledge them or even do them. If a Christian church does not want to do it then so be it, but i think legal court marriages should happen.

3) Adoption I don't care much about it, I don't like the argument that if gay people can marry they will adopt because that's just an assumption. It's just like saying that because straight people get married they will make babies. If they truly want a child then I am okay with it but I don't see it as a necessity at the current moment as much as actual rights for marriage. One step at a time, lets tackle the most important issue before we try to ask for too much.
_________________
A blessed rage for order

I'd break the law once every week, just to feel your touch.



View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:48 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  High Prophet Crozeus
Sith Priest
Sith Priest

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 4498


Location: I am yu, and he is mi.

Well said Mario. There should be more laws put in place for legal marriages if religious ministers don't want to perform them.
_________________




View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:50 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Yodafueva
Jedi
Jedi

Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 241


Location: Superunknown

I'm against them marrying, and even more so raising kids. Marriage is a tradition between a man and a woman, not women and women or man and man. Letting them raise kids would be moronic.
_________________


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

 PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:20 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Darth Macht
Sith Acolyte
Sith Acolyte

Joined: 28 Feb 2008
Posts: 239



1. What is your opinion of homosexuality and bisexuality and of homosexuals and bisexuals?

Are you asking my opinions of them as people? They're people.

2. What is your opinion on gay marriage?

Who cares? I'm a conservative- generally- but on this issue I must say: I don't honestly care what they do with their lives. The state should recognize it (religions, however, shouldn't).

3. What is your opinion on gay adoption?

Meh.....

I've always hated this question. It comes down to a politically incorrect statement that I've always hated to say: Homosexuality is an unnatural.... I don't want to call it a disorder but I guess I'm trying to say that. It just isn't good for a child to be raised with.


Yodafueva, I agree with you almost entirely if you said you're against them marrying in a religious ceremony. The secular state should just say "you've entered into a legal contract, go and be idiots and screw up your life just like straight people."
_________________




Patron: Darth Nihilus


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:52 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Durza
Sith Apprentice
Sith Apprentice

Joined: 21 Sep 2009
Posts: 230


Location: *Sigh*

FUN!!! FACT!!!!

Many years before political correctness, homosexuality WAS considered a mental disorder!

[i]I'm not saying this is my view on the matter, but it was theirs.[/i]


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:50 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Lord Aequitas
Sith Lord Second Degree
Sith Lord Second Degree

Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 5702


Location: Prancing through the fields like a prancing...prancer.

Durza wrote:
FUN!!! FACT!!!!

Many years before political correctness, homosexuality WAS considered a mental disorder!

I'm not saying this is my view on the matter, but it was theirs.


Many Years?

Durza, the American Psychologist's Association (or whatever it's called) still lists homosexality as a mental disorder.
_________________


Emperor Shadow wrote:
Taking creepiness to a new level since 80something ABY.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:37 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Durza
Sith Apprentice
Sith Apprentice

Joined: 21 Sep 2009
Posts: 230


Location: *Sigh*

1. The reason for using many years, was because I thought liberalism had destroyed the idea, and was unsure when.

2. Wow  Shocked  I didn't know that, like from 1(above) I thought the liberals had trashed the idea.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:39 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Durza
Sith Apprentice
Sith Apprentice

Joined: 21 Sep 2009
Posts: 230


Location: *Sigh*

1. The reason for using many years, was because I thought liberalism had destroyed the idea, and was unsure when.

2. Wow  Shocked  I didn't know that, like from 1(above) I thought the liberals had trashed the idea.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 2:22 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  High Prophet Crozeus
Sith Priest
Sith Priest

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 4498


Location: I am yu, and he is mi.

Homosexuality is a recent word.
_________________




View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:54 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  High Mage Serratus
Sith Marauder
Sith Marauder

Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 1578


Location: Eating a bagel (LIKE A BOSS)

I've decided to continue this discussion where it belongs.

Supreme Commander Alor wrote:
Yes, I am Catholic. And I do not pray in public and I have yet to be put to death, so I can hardly say that I don't follow those rules. But even amongst Catholics, there are varying degrees of faithfulness. I did not find the suffering funny. I found the fact that the rest of the world is just supposed to drop their beliefs for thousands of years and start liking people that make them uncomfortable, go against their every belief, and goes against humanity.


For thousands of years? No. For less than two thousand? Yes, but it's still morally wrong.

LGBT History wrote:
Homosexuality was a perfectly acceptable sexual orientation in ancient Egypt and circa 2400 BC, the Overseers of the Manicurists in the Palace of King Niuserre during the Fifth Dynasty of Egyptian pharaohs were a gay couple, Khnumhotep and Niankhkhnum, and were also royal confidants to Niuserre, even receiving burial in a necropolis along with other royal aides.

In ancient Crete, circa 1600 BC - 600 BC, homosexual relationships were not only considered perfectly natural and healthy but they were encouraged in the Cretan aristocracy and, in fact, it was considered deeply shameful for a young aristocrat to not have a male lover.

In ancient Greece, while same-sex marriage was not legally recognised, homosexual relationships were common and socially acceptable, and such relationships were modelled identically to Greek marriages but for the difference in gender of one of the partners.

During the same time, Sappho of Lesbos wrote her many love poems to other women (and also invented the original Mixolydian mode, though because her writings were destroyed by Christians, the name was taken and applied to something completely different but not the actual music theory itself). Sappho of Lesbos would later provide the eventual inspiration for the modern-day terms sapphic and lesbian.

Approximately 200 years later, Plato's Symposium argues that love between two males is the highest form of love and that love between men and women is lustful, only useful for reproduction and prevents men reaching their full potential as people.

Fifty years after Symposium's publication, the Sacred Band of Thebes, an up-until-then-undefeated battalion of 150 gay couple is defeated by Philip II of Macedon, who bemoans their loss and praises their honour.

A mere 12 years later, Philip's bisexual son Alexander the Great conquers most of the known world and converts it to the gay-friendly Hellenistic culture, launching the Hellenistic Age.

With the beginning of the reign of Emperor Augustus, the Roman Empire is ushered in and the first gay marriage is performed. The Roman Empire is a time in which art and literature depict homosexual love in a positive light. Romans, like the Greeks, celebrated love and sex amongst men. Two Roman Emperors publicly married men (one of whom was Nero), some had gay lovers themselves (one of the most beloved Roman Emperors, Trajan, was famously homosexual and Elagabalus, another Emperor, married an athlete named Zoticus in a public ceremony), and homosexual prostitution was taxed.

Starting with the 300-400 AD period, in which Christianity spreads throughout the Western world, the first anti-homosexual laws were brought in. During this time, one of the last pieces of literature celebrating homosexual passion, Nonnus's Dionysiaca, was published.

During the 5th century AD, despite the numerous Christianity-inspired anti-gay laws, the Catholic Church continued to tax homosexual prostitutes.

400 years later, during the 9th century, also in spite of the many laws condemning his feelings as sin, Alcuin of York, an abbot, writes numerous love poems to other monks.

During the 1300s, Edward II of England had a gay lover, Piers Gaveston, Earl of Cornwall. Edward is killed in 1327. sodomised by a red-hot poker.

Over 200 years later, Mary Tudor repeals all laws against sodomy made by her father, only for them to be reinstated after her death by her sister.

In 1791 during the French Revolution, France decriminalises homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults.

Four years, later Luxembourg and Tuscany follow suit.

In 1811, the Netherlands decriminalises homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults.

Two years later, Bavaria does the same.

In 1828, the United States makes homosexuality a crime against nature.

Two years later, Brazil goes the opposite direction and decriminsalises it.

In 1852, Portugal decriminalises homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults.

Six years later, the Ottoman Empire decriminalises sodomy and East Timor completely decriminalises homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults.

In 1865, San Marino decriminalises homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults.

In 1870, Joseph and His Friend: A Story of Pennsylvania, the first American novel that portrays a homosexual relationship in a positive light, is published.

In 1871, the Second Reich criminalises homosexuality. During the decade immediately after, Guatemala, Mexico and Japan decriminalise homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults.

In 1886, Argentina decriminalises homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults.

Three years later, Italy follows suit.

In 1922, the USSR decriminalises homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults.

Two years later, Panama, Paraguay and Peru follow suit.

In 1930, Denmark decriminalises homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults.

Four years later, Uruguay follows suit.

During the 1940s, Iceland, Sweden, Switzerland and Suriname all decriminalise homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults. Homosexuals liberated from Nazi concentration camps by Allied forces are forced to serve out the rest of their sentence by their liberators.

In the 1950s, 190 US government employees are fired for being gay. During the same decade, Greece and Thailand join the majority of the Western World in decriminalising homosexuality and all homosexual acts between consenting adults.

In the 1960s, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Chad, Bulgaria, East Germany, West Germany, the United Kingdom and Canada join the majority.

In the 1970s, Kosovo, Austria, Costa Rica, Finland, Norway, Malta,  Croatia, Montenegro, Slovenia, Vojvodina, Cuba and Spain join the majority.

In the 1980s, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Colombia, Belize, Israel and Liechtenstein join the majority.

In the 1990s, the Bahamas, Hong Kong, Ukraine, the Isle of Man, Estonia, Latvia, the Republic of Ireland, Belarus, Gibraltar, Russia, Lithuania, Bermuda, Serbia, South Africa, Albania, Moldova, Romania, Australia, Ecuador,  Bosnia and Herzegovina, Chile, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Cyprus, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Gabon join the majority.

In 2003, Armenia joins the majority.

The next year, so do Cape Verde and the Marshall Islands.

A year after, that Puerto Rico conforms to the majority.

In 2006, the United States of America officially becomes completely free of anti-gay laws.

In 2009, India conforms to the majority.


So, as you can see, up until Christianity became prevalent, homosexuality was not only socially acceptable, it was encouraged. And as people realised it was immoral for religious beliefs to be prominent in democratically-elected governments, countries abandoned the illegality of homosexuality, most recently, the USA and India joined the moral majority.

Supreme Commander Alor wrote:
The entire basic instinct of life is to reproduce and carry on the species. Homosexuality betrays that basic instinct. It betrays the survival of the species. Homosexuality decreases the chance that humans have at least one member that is genetically immune to a certain outbreak, or another calamity. Oh, and did I mention the spread of STD's through the earlier years of homosexuality. Yes, thank you for getting HIV's in the blood banks. Thank you very much.


If the basic instinct of life is to reproduce, you would think animals would be constantly reproducing instead of having a mating season. I rather thought that the basic instinct of life is to continue to live.

Also, might I point out that the Earth is already overpopulated, it's not like we need more people. It's not like the orphanages of the world have a backlog of vacancies.

And that's not to mention that people who choose not to have children, elderly couples and sterile or infertile people are also "betraying the species" according to you.

And then we come to HIV. HIV was not transmitted in the early days of homosexuality because homosexuality predates human infection of HIV by several thousand years. And that's not to mention HIV is spread through all forms of sexual relations as well as through blood contact, and originated in chimpanzees of western Africa. HIV was introduced into the blood banks by people with HIV, not necessarily by homosexuals or bisexuals.

Supreme Commander Alor wrote:
I would like to say that I am not homophobic. I deal with homosexuals almost every day whether it be here, at college, or just seeing them in passing. I am able to work with them, and even be friends. But that does not mean I agree with homosexuality or that it does not break my moral compass.


You are homophobic, Chris, deal with it. You find homosexuality morally reprehensible. That's being homophobic. You may not be overtly homophobic and you may not allow it to interfere with your exchanges with homosexuals or bisexuals, but you are still homophobic.

Supreme Commander Alor wrote:
Homosexuality is common among humans, if you can say common. But name one other species on the earth that basically says "Screw surviving, I like animals of the same sex." There are other species that hold relationships, yet they have no homosexuality. And saying that homosexuality is an enlightened state, only coming about from an educated people is a one way ticket to me forever doubting your intelligence.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...ls_displaying_homosexual_behavior
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...ds_displaying_homosexual_behavior

Note that these are only the birds and mammals which display homosexual behaviour and does not include reptiles, amphibians, etc.

Also, I suggest you read the Kinsey Reports, which are considered the definitive investigations into sexual behaviour and orientation to this day.

Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
Sexual Behavior in the Human Female

According to the Kinsey Reports, only 10% of the population are exclusively heterosexual and only 10% of the population are exclusively homosexual. The other 80% of the population are, to varying degrees on either side of the absolute middle ground, somewhat bisexual.

Supreme Commander Alor wrote:
There will always be a scapegoat, there will always be the persecution of what people find to be morally wrong. So yes, it is normal and expected. Just as the Irish immigrants were persecuted in Boston. Or the American prisoners were persecuted in Vietnam or The Pacific WWII Front.

I do not active discriminate against homosexuals. But I am not accepting of their behavior and desires.


All discrimination is morally wrong. All peoples are born free and equal with certain inalienable rights. Sound familiar?

Supreme Commander Alor wrote:
And in case anyone wanted to go with the "its genetics and in the brain" argument. Well then why don't we cure it like other ailments? Or have medication to help prevent it?


Well, first of all, it's not an ailment, disease or disorder of any kind, so there should be no reason to prevent it in the first place.

And second of all, are you implying that all medical conditions can be cured? Because if so, I'm very sorry to burst your bubble.

Supreme Commander Alor wrote:
All in all, I do not hate homosexuals. Don't think that of me. But for religious and personal beliefs and morals, I have yet to accept them as an ethical occurrence.


You don't hate them, you just find their existence unnatural and immoral. Which is so much better.

Supreme Commander Alor wrote:
There will be no easy solution to this. No long worded post will convince me or change my morals. So I suggest we drop this topic and move on to something happier.


Well, unfortunately, I have a drive and compulsion to challenge moral indecency, but fortunately, I've brought it to the right place to do so.
_________________



If you see dreadlocks and a staff coming towards you very rapidly, you're in trouble.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:00 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Jastin
Sith Apprentice
Sith Apprentice

Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 271



If you have a drive to challenge moral indecency you're on the wrong side . I don't think you understand the position of Christianity, we don't hate homosexuals we just hate what they do.

1. My opinion of homosexuals and bisexuals is that they're regular people who are like everyone else in the world sinful. I'm not saying homosexuals are the only sinners but everyone is a sinner. I also think that it's wrong of homosexuals to try and force people to accept them, and I think it's a double standard when they want to say that's their lifestyle choice and then they don't give us the choice to not accept it.

2. I don't approve of homosexual marriage because marriage is supposed to be between a man and a woman. I don't approve of divorce either, when two people get married it's like they become one person and divorce is like ripping that person in two.

3. I wouldn't have any problems with gay adoption except for the fact that gay parents would present what I believe to be the bad example that homosexuality is "ok".


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:20 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Lord Aequitas
Sith Lord Second Degree
Sith Lord Second Degree

Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 5702


Location: Prancing through the fields like a prancing...prancer.

How is the campaign for moral decency a bad thing? And I can actually answer for Serratus here.

We live in Ireland. 90% of our schools are run by the Catholic Church. Hell, my sister is currently being taught by nuns. I think we understand Christianity pretty well.



I'd like to reply to your answer of Q1 with the following.

You say Christianity hate what homosexuals do. So it's in the Bible, yada yada yada etcetera. And the world's Christians, no matter the denomination are told to frown upon homosexuals etc.

So basically, in a nutshell cos it's 3am and I don't need this, homosexuals aren't allowed to ask people to change their ways, maybe do a little campaigning, just to make their lives a bit easier, but heterosexuals are allowed to persecute homosexuals and "to try and force people" to change from being homo to hetero.

Ok. I like the hypocrisy there.



With regards to Q2, I agree. A "marriage" is considered a religious institution and if religions don't wish to include homosexuals, that's their choice. Just like it's the choice of other religions to do so. People can change their religion, that's no problem. What I and many other homosexuals campaign for recognition as couples in the eyes of the law to equal that of a hetero couple. Call it what you may, many tend to call it marriage. It's just an umbrella term.



And with Q3.

Oh, sweet deity forbid that homosexuals could adopt a child and bring it into a loving home. It's just so terrible. It's worse than the thought of drug dealers adopting a child, worse than the thought of leaving them familyless in an orphanage where they not even be wanted, let alone cared for. It's even worse than the thought of leaving them with heterosexual couples who'll abuse them mentally or physically.

Yeah, because all homosexuals do is have sex with someone of the same gender.
_________________


Emperor Shadow wrote:
Taking creepiness to a new level since 80something ABY.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:36 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Supreme Commander Alor
Dark Lord/Main Admin
Dark Lord/Main Admin

Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Posts: 4774


Location: Designing a new superweapon...

First off, I would just like to change what Crozeus said in his first post here.
Crozeus wrote:
Any intolerence will be punsihed.


Intolerance is just as much a choice as tolerance. TDSL neither supports nor discriminates against homosexuality. TDSL is a neutral party on this issue, as it is on all issues up for debate. The users are allowed to have their own opinions on issues, but TDSL does not force any user to a certain view.
____________________________________________________

Serratus wrote:
For thousands of years? No. For less than two thousand? Yes, but it's still morally wrong.


So you are telling me that before Christianity, there wasn't a single religion, race, culture, or government that found homosexuality immoral? The Roman Republic and Hebrews found homosexuality to be immoral. It is hardly a post-Christian idea.
Wikipedia wrote:
In the days of the Roman Republic, pederasty [homosexual behavior] was considered a degenerate Greek practice.

Wikipedia wrote:
Throughout most of the history of ancient Israel, intercourse between males was condemned outright as an "abomination".





LGBT History wrote:
In ancient Greece, while same-sex marriage was not legally recognised, homosexual relationships were common and socially acceptable, and such relationships were modelled identically to Greek marriages but for the difference in gender of one of the partners.

LGBT History wrote:
Approximately 200 years later, Plato's Symposium argues that love between two males is the highest form of love and that love between men and women is lustful, only useful for reproduction and prevents men reaching their full potential as people.

Someone forgot to mention the degree of the relationships in Greece.

Wikipedia wrote:
In Ancient Greece homoerotic practices were widely present, and integrated into the religion, education, philosophy and military culture. The sexualized form of these relationships was the topic of vigorous debate. In particular, anal intercourse was condemned by many, including Plato, as a form of hubris and faulted for dishonoring and feminizing the boys. Relations between adult males were generally ridiculed. Plato also believed that the chaste form of the relationship was the mark of an enlightened society.


The Greeks hardly accepted homosexual practices. They believed that a young man should be partnered with an older, more experienced male to "show him the ropes" of how to deal with woman. To pass on wisdom. Not to be lovers, or soul mates as your history seems to imply.

Plato did not condone or support sex between men. He accepted relationships, but no physical aspect or any imitation of reproductive behaviors. Plato was an early critic of sexual intercourse in pederastic relationships, proposing that men's love of boys avoid all carnal expression and instead progress from admiration of the lover's specific virtues to love of virtue itself in abstract form. While copulation with boys was often criticized and seen as shameful and brutish, other aspects of the relationship were considered beneficial. The mentor was expected to teach the young man or to see to his education, and to give him certain appropriate ceremonial gifts.



I would also like to point out that several of the figurehead persons you name, Princes, Kings, Queens, etc., were inbred and raised under trying situations. They weren't normal people. I'm not saying that being inbred is the cause of homosexuality, but they were not the average human in those days.



Serratus wrote:
So, as you can see, up until Christianity became prevalent, homosexuality was not only socially acceptable, it was encouraged. And as people realised it was immoral for religious beliefs to be prominent in democratically-elected governments, countries abandoned the illegality of homosexuality, most recently, the USA and India joined the moral majority.


Yes, homosexuality itself is not banned. But starting with the UK in 1988, the promotion of homosexuality is illegal. Morocco, Romania, Uganda, Lithuania, and Poland also either have bans or are considering placing such bans as recent as June 16, 2009 (Lithuania).



Serratus wrote:
If the basic instinct of life is to reproduce, you would think animals would be constantly reproducing instead of having a mating season. I rather thought that the basic instinct of life is to continue to live.


Consider the situations that natural animals are in. After mating, there is the gestation period. Then there is a period of raising the young and regaining strength (for the females that bore the offspring). By that time, the environment is changing, mostly turning into Winter, during which a majority of mammals hibernate or migrate.

The reason for a mating season is to keep things in check. It gives order to life, and helps them live. If reproduction could take place outside of the mating season. What would stop a male from ravaging a female that is already pregnant? Or nursing? If animals were concerned with reproducing year round, other survival instincts would become dull. No longer is the idea "survive until you can mate" its "mate mate mate".

Humans are one of the few species to actively promote reproduction during the entire year. Rats have no breeding season, and the female rat enter heat once every 4-5 days, except when already pregnant or nursing. On the other side of the spectrum, the gestation period of an elephant is 22 months. Hardly any time to be reproducing year round.



Serratus wrote:
Also, might I point out that the Earth is already overpopulated, it's not like we need more people. It's not like the orphanages of the world have a backlog of vacancies.


Oh, so now homosexuality is just a population control measure? A good thing because it keeps humans from reproducing. Lovely idea.



Serratus wrote:
And that's not to mention that people who choose not to have children, elderly couples and sterile or infertile people are also "betraying the species" according to you.


The elderly, sterile, and infertile hardly choose not to have children. It is a medical impossibility. Yes, we can make test tube babies, but that is not reproducing, it is creating. The reason sexual reproduction feels good is to help along the drive to do so. If one is incapable of reproducing, it is hardly there fault. Homosexuality, since you say it is not a medical ailment or condition, must be a choice. Not reproducing by choice is an act of betrayal to the species. And I never said that homosexuals are the only ones betraying the species. Yes, I believe that choosing to not reproduce is a betrayal of the fundamental instincts of humanity's survival. But only if it is by choice.



Serratus wrote:
And then we come to HIV. HIV was not transmitted in the early days of homosexuality because homosexuality predates human infection of HIV by several thousand years. And that's not to mention HIV is spread through all forms of sexual relations as well as through blood contact, and originated in chimpanzees of western Africa. HIV was introduced into the blood banks by people with HIV, not necessarily by homosexuals or bisexuals.


You are correct. But the spread of HIV once human infection began was due largely to homo/bisexual men.
CDC Report
The document says that 67% of the counted cases of HIV are found in bisexual/homosexual men.
CDC wrote:
The CDC also warned that a survey of 15-29-year-old men who engaged in sodomy “reported that the proportion of unrecognized HIV infection was as high as 77%.”


Around 48% of all people diagnosed with AIDS in America were infected with HIV through male-to-male sexual contact, while people exposed through heterosexual contact comprise around 17% total AIDS cases. And this heterosexual contact was consider "high risk" meaning that a women had sex with a bisexual/homosexual man and got HIV's, and then in turn gave it to a heterosexual male. The remaining cases are from receipt of blood, blood products or tissue from infected persons.

But you are right, obviously homosexuality has nothing to do with the spread of HIV.



Serratus wrote:
You are homophobic, Chris, deal with it. You find homosexuality morally reprehensible. That's being homophobic. You may not be overtly homophobic and you may not allow it to interfere with your exchanges with homosexuals or bisexuals, but you are still homophobic.


I am not homophobic. Homosexuality goes against my morals, my religion, and my code of conduct. Homophobia is the fear homosexual people and homosexuality. I do not fear homosexuals or homosexuality, I just do not find their behavior moral. If you are going to accuse me of being something, please make sure it is true first.



Serratus wrote:
All discrimination is morally wrong. All peoples are born free and equal with certain inalienable rights. Sound familiar?


You defined homosexuality as a choice. Therefore it is not a tendency to a newborn. It is not something to be born with. Yes, we are born equal, but the choices we make in our lives can change that. For example, a murderer was born equal, but chose to commit murder. Now he is stuck in jail. He lost his natural born rights because of his choice.



Serratus wrote:
Well, first of all, it's not an ailment, disease or disorder of any kind, so there should be no reason to prevent it in the first place.

And second of all, are you implying that all medical conditions can be cured? Because if so, I'm very sorry to burst your bubble.


1. That is your opinion. We have yet to completely unravel the human DNA, and there very well could be a Homosexual gene. And it could also be a medical condition due to the childhood of the homosexual person. Anything is possible. There is no proof either way on the topic. It may or may not be.

2. All medical conditions can be cured. Perhaps not right now. But to every ailment there is a cure. The majority of causes and cures are hidden deep within Genetic sequences that we have yet to unravel. So all medical conditions can be cured, just not at this exact moment in time.
That is like saying that if a doctor couldn't conduct a surgery in a location due to the lack of tools or the presence of insanitary conditions, that the surgery cannot be done at all. It may not be able to be performed at that time, but it hardly makes the procedure impossible.



Seeratus wrote:
You don't hate them, you just find their existence unnatural and immoral. Which is so much better.


I am allowed my own opinions, as is anyone. It is a right to be gay, but not my right to not accept it? It is my duty to accept homosexuality, but not an option for me not to accept it? It is correct for me to have to accept gay marriage, but not correct for homosexuals to accept my view of marriage as being between a man and a woman? How is it that people can defend someones choice to be homosexual. But not accept someone else's choice to not agree with homosexuality?



Serratus wrote:
Well, unfortunately, I have a drive and compulsion to challenge moral indecency, but fortunately, I've brought it to the right place to do so.


So you are against homosexuality as well? Because if you are challenging moral indecency, then that is one item that falls into the category. It is up to each person what moral indecency is. So we are both coming here with the same intentions.

My own convictions are mine, and no matter what you say, I highly doubt they can be changed. I am up for a good debate, but if you are here only to convert me, you shouldn't bother to reply. Because I will not be converted.
_________________


Once known as Darth Marix



Emperor Shadow wrote:
The Military has always been a good counter-weight to my agendas..


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:10 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Jastin
Sith Apprentice
Sith Apprentice

Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 271



First of all I want to say right on Alor you and I are really like minded about this issue. Second I want to say that Aequitas is putting words in my mouth , also who's supposed to know more about Christianity the Christian or the other guy? I know more about Christianity than you do. The Bible is an Completely reliable and homosexuals aren't just asking they are forcing and pressuring. Also I don't support persecuting homosexuals. I wouldn't do something wrong to a homosexual just because they are homosexual. I'm not going to say they can't adopt because like you said those children need homes. I know homosexuals do more than just have homosexual sex so don't talk down to me as if I were an idiot. I just think it sets a bad example for the children they adopt.




View user's profile Send private message

Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Dark Sith Lords Forum Index » Coruscant Debates

Page 1 of 4
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Display posts from previous:

  

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Sith Lords by Scott Stubblefield

Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum