|
|
|
Darth Suspria,
I enjoyed your post very much. It brings to light an important social expectation versus human behavior. According to some researchers like Alfred Kinsey, sex is not as intimate as groups (religious and secular) would make it. His thesis rests on the assumption that humans are animals, and animals have recreatioal sex "all the time," so why shouldn't humans?
Now, I will agree that the demeaning nature of prostitution comes into play/conflict with one's personal values. If you believe it is demeaning, then it is likely your opinion will never change. However, there is a market (pardon the term) that believes it to be a healthy, natural part of life. It isn't called "the world's oldest profession" for nothing!
Oh please, never call me Emperor in a debate! I'm Will.
There is that middle-ground of the debate. Prostitution is not go away, may as well make it comfortable for everyone. I agree, regulating would better protect the women and men who engage in the sex trade. Human trafficking, violence perpetrated by pimps and johns would decrease, and wider public health would ultimately benefit. _________________
That, that is, is; that, that is not, is not.
Today's Evil Overlord Mood/Thought Process of the Day: Gungan opera
The Realist Party. You can't repel appeal of our magnitude.
|
|